Is there a strategic error in Allergan’s bid?



The Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. anticipated an unwanted share and cash bid for Allergan. The previous year the company made strategic decisions but these decisions were subject to persisting delays and moreover alleged attacks by Allergan itself. What Valeant really wanted to do was to join hands with Pershing Square Capital Management and then collaborate to gather almost 10 percent shares of Allergan. This was before signing an ongoing deal which caused immense pain and suffering. Before the bid was announced Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. shares were being traded at a higher percentage.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. is likely to get benefits from the preparations made with Pershing Square. Through the stakes of Allergan, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. expects a linked connection to the shareholders of Allergan. This will result in massive number of votes and thus eventually ruin Allergan’s defenses to the bidding. Moreover if it a topping bid for Allergan, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc.is expected to divide the revenues on the stocks of Pershing Square’s. On the other hand, Pershing Square is doing its best to let down Allergan and thus wants to support Valeant acquisition and cost reducing policies. Pershing square also decided to let go of the cash the company was providing and looked forward to only Valeant’s stocks. But in general it seems like Valeant has lost on a good option which could have assisted them in capitalizing the defenses on Allergan’s weak takeover.
We all are aware of the external issues such as pressure coming from various activists, investors; firms dealing with proxy advisory have concluded that the results of Allergan are plundering their takeover defenses in the previous couple of years. But the company has allowed Pershing Square to acquire the stocks that drove Valeant right into the one area where Allergan having residual defenses as well
Allergan stock in its charter allows those stakeholders that have 25% of the companies share to keep a meeting whenever required. According to Pershing Square the laws are very complex and intricate which can result in the cancellation of the meeting primarily because an individual violated the laws. Using this tactic, Allergan is charging on Pershing Square and Valeant. They believe that such accusations do not have solid grounds.
It is really easy to evaluate a takeover plan  but in such a case where the takeover drags it gives ample opportunity for the target to fight back.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment